#Climate Change – Not Allowed in Florida

The Everglades

During my tenure as a writer/editor/public relations director at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the agency took very seriously the threat of climate change to a state surrounded on three sides by water and subject to violent storm surges, eroding beaches, and disappearing habitat. The endangerment of 575 species of wildlife and 700 species of fish, both fresh- and saltwater, worried wildlife managers.

I took pride in the agency’s climate change initiatives and served as editor to the publication, Florida’s Wildlife: On the front line of climate change in 2009. IMG_0088The head of the climate change committee asked me personally to write a column on wildlife and climate change, which I did for two years. The Wildlife Forecast was published in newspapers, newsletters, and magazines around the state. Audubon Society and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reprinted the column on occasion.

Then in late 2010, I received word that my column was on hold until after the first Tuesday in November. That last column never made it into print.

What happened? Gov. Rick Scott happened. With his election in November 2010, state employees ran scared. The word went out that agencies, such as the FWC and Florida’s DEP, needed to tread carefully. Their budgets were on the line, and suddenly, despite scientific data and scientists’ assertions on the reality of climate change, the concept became verboten.

I left Florida soon after to move to Pennsylvania. Many of my colleagues, including any involved with climate change initiatives, moved onto the federal government. Many told me I’d certainly chosen my departure from the agency at an opportune time.

It’s interesting how things spiral together at one moment. I woke up this past Saturday morning with a thought running through my head: Publish The Wildlife Forecast columns in a book. I pulled them out and put them together and remembered how the column ended. I’d forgotten. Then two days later, an article came across my Facebook news feed from the Miami Herald. The headline screamed:

In Florida, officials ban term ‘climate change’

(Click on headline for link to the full article.)

Here’s an excerpt:

“We were told not to use the terms ‘climate change,’ ‘global warming’ or ‘sustainability,’” said Christopher Byrd, an attorney with the DEP’s Office of General Counsel in Tallahassee from 2008 to 2013. “That message was communicated to me and my colleagues by our superiors in the Office of General Counsel.”

Kristina Trotta, another former DEP employee who worked in Miami, said her supervisor told her not to use the terms “climate change” and “global warming” in a 2014 staff meeting. “We were told that we were not allowed to discuss anything that was not a true fact,” she said.

This unwritten policy went into effect after Gov. Rick Scott took office in 2011 and appointed Herschel Vinyard Jr. as the DEP’s director, according to former DEP employees. Gov. Scott, who won a second term in November, has repeatedly said he is not convinced that climate change is caused by human activity, despite scientific evidence to the contrary.

We journalists were advised a decade ago by news organizations to stop using the term “global warming” because it placed blame for climate changes on mankind’s actions. It was suggested we used the term “climate change” instead in all of our articles. I agreed because climate change is more accurate. The predictions are for wild and intense changes in all things dealing with climate. More frequent and intense storms, unpredictable weather catastrophes, and extreme variations in temperatures. Scientists point to Florida as one of the most vulnerable places in the world because of its shape and location. That’s too big of a concern to simply ignore.

DSC00863However, even more concerning is the culture of a state government, in this case run by businessman Rick Scott, to forbid the use of any words by employees. I can tell you as I prepared to leave my job with the FWC, employees were running scared of losing jobs because of their beliefs. Is this ever a good thing?

The FWC’s website still offers the publication Florida’s Wildlife: On the front line of climate change in PDF form (Click here), which is good. They still have a special initiative for climate change, although it’s not listed in the main menu. Maybe things aren’t as dire as the article points out. I’ll keep my fingers crossed that open dialogue still exists in my beloved Florida, no matter what our beliefs.

???????????????????????????????I also believe the Easter bunny will deliver me a basket of goodies in early April along with a front yard filled with daffodils and tulips.

 

20 thoughts on “#Climate Change – Not Allowed in Florida

  1. I moved here as a retiree in 2012 and did not buy a home with climate change knowledge in the back of my mind, along with the high rates for insurance for a home near Sanibel Island.

    I have been surprised with the local government discussion and or lack of preparation for the next ten to twenty years into the future as the seas rise just five feet in Southwest Florida.

    I have traveled extensively via motorcycle over the past decade from Key West to Fairbanks Alaska and I don’t think I need a degree in the sciences to see the changes with the melting snow packs out west and wonder where the water is going?

    There is only so much water the ocean can hold before it comes ashore.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Nuts! My former father-in-law worked for DOI’s F&W as Regional Director. He retired when they published the figures on the Florida panthers project he had worked on in the field. They were not even remotely close to the numbers he had crunched in Atlanta.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Outrageous. It isn’t just Florida. The same thing was happening in Canada with federal employees. Also, “North Carolina, Louisiana and Tennessee have all passed laws that attempt to cast doubt on established climate science in boardrooms and classrooms.” Coincidentally I just read about this propaganda effort at http://www.livescience.com/50085-states-outlaw-climate-change.html Then I saw your post. Thank you so much for passing this info on. People need to know.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Debra, thanks for commenting. It’s amazing to me. How can folks bury their heads so deeply in the sand, ignoring the migratory bird pattern shifts, rising sea levels, and a myriad of other things happening over the long term. So what if they don’t believe “man” caused it? It’s happening.

      Like

      • I know! It all looks so obvious to me. And it kind of freaks me out that people keep posing this as an impossible problem to solve. It isn’t really. Use your car only when necessary. Reduce electrical consumption, eat less meat (or better go vegan), grow some of your veggies and compost your kitchen waste. Cars, factory farmed meat/dairy and garbage are some of the biggest polluters and all those things can be pretty easily controlled by ordinary people.

        As for industry … I just found a link that can tell people exactly which companies are spewing greenhouse gases in their area. Let those companies know you are aware of what they are doing. Ask them if they can do better. http://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do

        Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve seen the headlines about this, and also headlines about Scott’s denial that he’s forbidding any talk of changing climate issues. But I so enjoyed your post, and the personal perspective you bring. And I am so looking forward to your book projectile for “The Wildlife Forecast,” (Yes! yes! please do that!!) And I followed the link and read the Miami Herald piece with great interest.

    My sense is that – our failing state governments aside – we are all starting to acknowledge and talk about climate change among ourselves; feel a tipping point has been reached within the last 12 months, tho I can’t say when; or why. But I sure hope I’m right. Discussion of this would be an important early step to concerted actions to combat the problem. (And no matter what one wants to call it, our voracious appetite for energy from fossil fuels should be curbed at least somewhat , as should ANY voracious appetite – that would normally be just good conservative common sense but we sure aren’t living in “normal” times, imo.)

    I could go on all day here (I won’t) about what’s happening in the Department of Natural Resources in my own state (Wisconsin). Somone should do a book about natural resource professionals employed by those state governments that are now hostile to science; it must be among the most stressful jobs in the U.S. currently.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s